H. Craig Melchert*
Show more
* – Carrboro, NC. Email: melchert@humnet.ucla.edu
Cite as Melchert, H. C. 2021: Lycian Relative Clauses. Hungarian Assyriological Review 2: 65–75.
Abstract
Lycian relative clause syntax generally matches that of Hittite and other Anatolian Indo-European languages, with some minor differences due to Lycian SVO word order. One putative major contrast is that Lycian seems to have at least one example showing “overt wh-movement”. Arguments are made that opening formulas with enclitic =ti in funerary inscriptions contain a reflexive particle, not “cleft” structures with the relative pronoun.
Keywords: clefts, Lycian, reflexive particle, relative clauses
Copyright and acknowledgements
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data availability. The author confirms that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Disclosure statement. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Funding statement. The author received no financial support for the research and the publication of this article.
Bibliography
Beckman, G. 1996: Hittite Diplomatic Texts. (SBL Writings from the Ancient World 7) Atlanta.
Borchhardt, J. ‒ Eichner, H. ‒ Pesditschek, M. ‒ Ruggendorfer, P. 1997‒1999: Archäologisch-sprachwissenschaftliches Corpus der Denkmäler mit lykischer Schrift. Anzeiger der philosophisch-historischen Klasse, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften 134/2, 11‒96.
Christiansen, B. 2019: Grave Matters. Legal Provisions for a Proper Final Rest in Classical Lycia. In: Zimmermann, M. (ed.): Das Xanthostal in archaisch-klassischer Zeit. Eine archäologisch-historische Bestandsaufnahme. (Die hellenistische Polis als Lebensform 7) Göttingen, 166‒261. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783946317616.166
Christiansen, B. forthcoming: Corpus der lykischen Inschriften I. Die ostlykischen Inschriften.
Daues, A. 2009: Form und Funktion – die Wortstellung in den lykischen Grabinschriften. In: Rieken, E. – Widmer, P. (eds.): Pragmatische Kategorien. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 24. bis 26. September 2007 in Marburg. Wiesbaden, 53‒63.
Eichner, H. 2017: Ein philologisch-sprachwissenschaftlicher Blick auf den Fortgang der lykischen Studien seit Emmanuel Laroche. In: Mouton, A. (ed.): Hittitology Today. Studies on Hittite and Neo-Hittite Anatolia in Honor of Emmanuel Laroche’s 100th Birthday. L’hittitologie aujourd’hui. Études sur l’Anatolie hittite et néo-hittite à l’occasion du centenaire de la naissance d’Emmanuel Laroche. 5èmes Rencontres d’archéologie de l’IFÉA, Istanbul, 21-22 novembre, 2014. Istanbul, 277‒299. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.ifeagd.3587
Garrett, A. 1992: Topics in Lycian Syntax. Historische Sprachforschung 105, 200‒212.
Garrett, A. 1994: Relative Clause Syntax in Lycian and Hittite. Die Sprache 36, 29‒69.
Goedegebuure, P. 2009: Focus Structure and Q-word Questions in Hittite. Linguistics 47, 945‒969. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.033
Goedegebuure, P. 2014: The Hittite Demonstratives. Studies in Deixis, Topics and Focus. (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 55) Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc16s5m
Goldstein, D. 2014: Object agreement in Lycian. Historische Sprachforschung 127, 101‒124. https://doi.org/10.13109/hisp.2014.127.1.101
Gusmani, R. 1962: Zur Frage des lykischen Relativpronomens. Indogermanische Forschungen 67, 159‒176.
Hajnal, I. 1995: Der lykische Vokalismus. Methode und Erkenntnisse der vergleichenden anatolischen Sprachwissenschaft, angewandt auf das Vokalsystem einer Kleincorpussprache. Graz.
Hale, M. 1987: Notes on Wackernagel’s Law in the Language of the Rigveda. In: Watkins, C. (ed.): Studies in Memory of Warren Cowgill. Papers from the Fourth East Coast Indo-European Conference, Cornell University 1985. (Studies in Indo-European Language and Culture 3) Berlin ‒ New York, 38‒59.
Held, W. 1957: The Hittite Relative Sentence. (Language Dissertations 55) Baltimore. https://doi.org/10.2307/522235
Huggard, M. 2011: On Wh-(Non)-Movement and Internal Structures of the Hittite Preposed Relative Clause. In: Jamison, S. W. – Melchert, H. C. – Vine, B. (eds.): Proceedings of the 22nd Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference. November 5th and 6th, 2010. Bremen, 83‒104.
Huggard, M. 2015: Wh-words in Hittite. A Study in Syntax-Semantics and Syntax-Phonology Interfaces. Unpublished PhD dissertation (University of California Los Angeles). Los Angeles.
Kloekhorst, A. 2011: The Opening Formula of Lycian Funerary Inscriptions: mẽti vs. mẽne. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 70, 13‒23. https://doi.org/10.1086/658474
Melchert, H. C. 1999: Once More on the Conclusion of the Lycian Trilingual of the Létôon. Historische Sprachforschung 112, 75‒77.
Melchert, H. C. 2004: A Dictionary of the Lycian Language. Ann Arbor – New York.
Melchert, H. C. 2016: Relative Clauses in Anatolian. In: Neri, S. – Schuhmann, R. – Zeilfelder, S. (eds.): »dat ih dir it nu bi huldi gibu« Linguistische, germanistische und indogermanistische Studien Rosemarie Lühr gewidmet. Wiesbaden, 287‒295.
Neumann, G. 2007: Glossar des Lykischen. Überarbeitet und zum Druck gebracht von Johann Tischler. (Dresdner Beiträge zur Hethitologie 21) Wiesbaden.
Probert, Ph. 2006: Clause Boundaries in Old Hittite Relative Sentences. Transactions of the Philological Society 104, 17‒83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2006.00165.x
Samuels, B. 2005: On the Left Periphery in Anatolian. Linguistic Analysis 35, 275‒297.
Seyer, M. – Tekoğlu, R. 2009: Das Felsgrab des Stamaha in Ostlykien – ein Zeugnis für die Ostpolitik des Perikle von Limyra? Die Sprache 48, 217‒226.