CaR vs. Ca-aR spellings in Hittite: evidence for a phonemic distinction between /ə/ and /a/

Alwin Kloekhorst* and Erik Mens*

Show more

* – Leiden University. Email (corresponding author): a.kloekhorst@hum.leidenuniv.nl

Cite as Kloekhorst, A., Mens, E. 2021: CaR vs. Ca-aR spellings in Hittite: evidence for a phonemic distinction between /ə/ and /a/. Hungarian Assyriological Review 2: 241–262.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52093/hara-202102-00022-000

Abstract

Inspired by earlier work on the distribution between the sign kán and the sign sequences k/g/qa-an in Hittite texts (Frotscher forthcoming), this article investigates the Hittite usage of three more cuneiform signs of the structure CaR (pár, ḫal and tar) vis-à-vis their corresponding Ca-aR spellings (pa-ar, ḫa-al, t/da-ar). It is argued that the distribution between CaR and Ca-aR spellings is not random, but etymologically determined: consistent spelling with CaR reflects PIE *CR̥ and *CeR[C], whereas alternation between CaR and Ca-aR reflects PIE *CoR. This is interpreted as evidence for a synchronic phonetic / phonemic distinction between the two types of spelling: consistent CaR renders the vowel /ə/, whereas alternation between CaR and Ca-aR denotes the vowel /a/.

Keywords: Hittite, cuneiform script, phonology, Indo-European

Copyright and acknowledgements

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data availability. The author confirms that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Disclosure statement. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Funding statement. The author received no financial support for the research and the publication of this article.

Bibliography

 

Burgin, J. 2019: Functional Differentiation in Hittite Festival Texts. An Analysis of the Old Manuscripts of the KI.LAM Great Assembly. (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 65) Wiesbaden.

CHD       = Güterbock, H.-G. – Hoffner, H. A. – van den Hout, Th. P. J. (eds.) 1983–: The Hittite Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Chicago.

del Monte, G. F. – Tischler, J. 1978: Die Orts- und Gewässernamen der hethitischen Texte. (Répertoire Géographique des Textes Cunéiformes 6/1 = Beihefte zum Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients 7/6) Wiesbaden.

Frotscher, M. forthcoming: Die Verteilung von „offener“ (-k/g/qa-an-) und „geschlossener“ Schreibung (‑kán-) innerhalb des Paradigmas hethitischer Verben.

van Gessel, B. H. L. 1998: Onomasticon of the Hittite Pantheon. (Handbuch der Orientalistik I/33) Leiden – New York – Köln. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004294028

Groddek, D. – Hagenbuchner, A. – Hoffmann, I. 2002: Hethitische Texte in Transkription: VS NF 12. (Dresdner Beiträge zur Hethitologie 6) Dresden.

Hagenbuchner, A. 1989: Die Korrespondenz der Hethiter 2. Die Briefe mit Transkription, Übersetzung und Kommentar. (Texte der Hethiter 16) Heidelberg.

HED = Puhvel, J. (1984–): Hittite Etymological Dictionary. Berlin – New York.

HEG = Tischler, J. (1977–2016): Hethitisches Etymologisches Glossar. (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 20) Innsbruck.

Hetkonk = Košak, S. (online): Konkordanz der hethitischen Keilschrifttafeln, Online-Datenbank. https://www.hethport.uni-wuerzburg.de/hetkonk/ (accessed: 06.05.2022).

Hoffner, H. A. – Melchert, H. C. 2008: A Grammar of the Hittite Language 1-2. (Languages of the Ancient Near East 1) Winona Lake. https://doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv240djsf

HW2 = Friedrich, J. – Kammenhuber, A. – Hoffmann, I. – Hagenbuchner-Dresel, A. – Giusfredi, F. – Hazenbos, J. 1975–: Hethitisches Wörterbuch. Zweite, völlig neubearbeitete Auflage auf der Grundlage der edierten hethitischen Texte. Heidelberg.

Kloekhorst, A. 2008: Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon. (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 5) Leiden – Boston.

Kloekhorst, A. 2010: Initial stops in Hittite (with an excursus on the spelling of stops in Alalaḫ Akkadian). Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 100, 197–241. https://doi.org/10.1515/za.2010.011

Kloekhorst, A. 2013: The signs TA and DA in Old Hittite: evidence for a phonetic difference. Altorientalische Forschungen 40, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1524/aof.2013.0007

Kloekhorst, A. 2014a: Accent in Hittite: A Study in Plene Spelling, Consonant Gradation, Clitics, and Metrics. (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 56) Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc2rm8t

Kloekhorst, A. 2014b: Once more on Hittite ā/e-ablauting ḫi-verbs. Indogermanische Forschungen 119, 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2014-0005

Kloekhorst, A. 2014c: The Proto-Indo-European acrostatic inflection reconsidered. In: Oettinger, N. – Steer, Th. (eds.): Das Nomen im Indogermanischen. Morphologie, Substantiv versus Adjektiv, Kollektivum. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 14. bis 16. September 2011 in Erlangen. Wiesbaden, 140–163.

Kloekhorst, A. 2019: Kanišite Hittite: The Earliest Attested Record of Indo-European. (Handbuch der Orientalistik I/132) Leiden – Boston. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004382107

Kloekhorst, A. 2020: The phonetics and phonology of the Hittite dental stops. In: Kim, R. I. – Mynářová, J. – Pavúk, P. (eds.): Hrozný and Hittite: The First Hundred Years. Proceedings of the International Conference Held at Charles University, Prague, 11-14 November 2015. (Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 107) Leiden – Boston, 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004413122_010

Kloekhorst, A. 2021: The phonetics and phonology of Hittite intervocalic fortis and lenis stops. Bibliotheca Orientalis 78, 327–352.

Melchert, H. C. 1983: A “new” PIE *men suffix. Die Sprache 29, 1–26.

Mens, E. 2020: tar and ḫal in Hittite: a distinction between CVC and CV-VC spellings in native Hittite words. Unpublished BA thesis (Leiden University). Leiden.

Norbruis, S. 2021: Indo-European Origins of Anatolian Morphology and Semantics. Innovations and Archaisms in Hittite, Luwian and Lycian. Amsterdam.

Rieken, E. 1999: Untersuchungen zur nominalen Stammbildung des Hethitischen. (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 44) Wiesbaden.

Rieken, E. et al. (ed.) 2009: CTH 370.I.8 – Mythologisches Fragment. hethiter.net/: CTH 370.I.8

Schrijver, P. C. H. 1991: The Reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European Laryngeals in Latin. (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 2) Amsterdam – Atlanta.

Siegelová, J. 1971: Appu-Märchen und Ḫedammu-Mythus (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 14) Wiesbaden.

Tremblay, X. 1999–2000: Phonology and philology in a cuneiform-written language. Archiv für Orientforschung 46-47, 216–226.

.