The Phoneticisation of the Luwian Hieroglyphic Writing System

Alexander J. J. Vertegaal*

Show more

* – Independent scholar. Email: xander.vertegaal@xs4all.nl

Cite as Vertegaal, A. J. J. 2021: The Phoneticisation of the Luwian Hieroglyphic Writing System. Hungarian Assyriological Review 2: 295–312.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52093/hara-202102-00025-000

Abstract

This paper offers a new perspective on the phoneticisation of the Luwian hieroglyphic writing system. It investigates to what extent we can determine the time frame in which they acquired their syllabographic values by relating them to key phonological and morphological changes in the Luwian language. Several hieroglyphic signs plausibly developed phonetic readings before particular linguistic developments took place, which suggests that the phoneticisation process took place over a long time and may have started centuries before the first texts (perhaps even in Proto-Luwic times), continuing gradually and continuously until the writing system was abandoned in the 7th century BCE.

Keywords: Luwian, hieroglyphs, phoneticisation, syllabograms

Copyright and acknowledgements

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data availability. The author confirms that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Disclosure statement. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Funding statement. The author received no financial support for the research and the publication of this article.

Bibliography

 

Adiego, I.-X. 2019: A Kingdom for a Carian Letter. In: Adiego, I.-X. – García Trabazo, J. V. – Vernet, M. – Obrador-Cursach, B. – Martínez Rodríguez, E. (eds.): Luwic Dialects and Anatolian: Inheritance and Diffusion. (Barcino Monographica Orientalia 12 = Series Anatolica et Indogermanica 1) Barcelona, 11–50.

Bauer, A. H. – Rieken, E. – Simon, Zs. – Sasseville, D. – Opfermann, A. 2021: Proto-Anatolian *mi̯éu̯-/mi̯u-ˊ. In: eDiAna. http://www.ediana.gwi.uni-muenchen.de/dictionary.php?lemma=1440 (accessed: 03.05.2022).

Boltz, W. G. 1986: Early Chinese Writing. World Archaeology 17, 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1986.9979980

Brixhe, C. 2007: History of the alphabet: Some guidelines for avoiding oversimplification. In: Christidis, A.-F. (ed.): A History of Ancient Greek. From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity. Cambridge, 277–287.

Burgin, J. M. 2016: Graphical Origins of ‘Initial-A-Final’ in Hieroglyphic Luwian. Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici NS 2, 7–32.

CHD L–N = Güterbock, H. G. – Hoffner, H. A. (eds.) 1989: The Hittite Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. L–N. Chicago.

CHLI = Hawkins, J. D. 2000: Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions. Inscriptions of the Iron Age I. (Untersuchungen zur indogermanischen Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft NF 8/1) Berlin – New York.

CLL = Melchert, H. C. 1993: Cuneiform Luvian Lexicon. (Lexica Anatolica 2) Chapel Hill.

Cooper, J. S. 1996: Sumerian and Akkadian. In: Daniels, P. T. – Bright, W. (eds.): The World’s Writing Systems. New York – Oxford, 37–57.

eDiAna = Hackstein, O. – Miller, J. L. – Rieken, E. (eds.): Digital Philological-Etymological Dictionary of the Minor Ancient Anatolian Corpus Languages. München – Marburg. https://www.ediana.gwi.uni-muenchen.de

Ferrara, S. 2017: Another beginning’s end: Secondary script formation in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean. In: Steele, Ph. M. (ed.): Understanding Relations Between Scripts. The Aegean Writing Systems. Oxford – Philadelphia, 7–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dr51.7

Gardiner, A. H. 1916: The Egyptian Origin of the Semitic Alphabet. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 3, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/030751331600300101

Goedegebuure, P. 2010: The Luwian adverbs zanta “down” and *ānni “with, for against”. In: Süel, A. (ed.): VII. Uluslararası Hititoloji Kongresi Bildirileri. Çorum 25–31 Aǧustos 2008. Acts of the VIIth International Congress of Hittitology. Çorum, August 25–31, 2008. Ankara, 299–318.

Goedegebuure, P. – van den Hout, Th. – Osborne, J. – Massa, M. – Bachhuber, C. – Şahin, F. 2020: TÜRKMEN-KARAHÖYÜK 1: a new Hieroglyphic Luwian inscription from Great King Hartapu, son of Mursili, conqueror of Phrygia. Anatolian Studies 70, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154620000022

Güterbock, H. G. 1940: Siegel aus Boğazköy. I. Die Königssiegel der Grabungen bis 1938. (Archiv für Orientforschung, Beiheft 5) Berlin.

Güterbock, H. G. 1998a: Die Hieroglypheninschrift von Fraktin. In: Hruška, B. – Komoróczy, G. (eds.): Festschrift Lubor Matouš, I. (Études publiées par les Chaires d’Histoire Ancienne de l’Université Eötvös Loránd de Budapest 24 = Assyriologia 4) Budapest, 201–204.

Güterbock, H. G. 1998b: Notes on Some Luwian Hieroglyphs. In: Jasanoff, J. – Melchert, H. C. – Oliver, L. (eds.): Mír Curad. Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins. (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 92) Innsbruck, 201–204.

Hajnal, I. 1995: Der lykische Vokalismus. Methode und Erkenntnisse der vergleichenden anatolischen Sprachwissenschaft, angewandt auf das Vokalsystem einer Kleincorpussprache. (Arbeiten aus der Abteilung „Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft“ 10) Graz.

Hamilton, G. J. 2006: The Origins of the West-Semitic Alphabet in Egyptian Scripts. (The Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 40) Washington.

Hawkins, J. D. 1986: Writing in Anatolia: Imported and Indigenous Systems. World Archaeology 17, 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1986.9979976

Hawkins, J. D. – Morpurgo Davies, A. 1993: Running and relatives in Luwian. Kadmos 32, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/kadm.1993.32.1.50

HED A = Puhvel, J. 1984: Hittite Etymological Dictionary 1. Words beginning with A. (Trends in Linguistics Documentation 1) Berlin – New York – Amsterdam.

HED M = Puhvel, J. 2004: Hittite Etymological Dictionary 6. Words beginning with M. (Trends in Linguistics Documentation 22) Berlin – New York.

HEG LM = Tischler, J. 1990: Hethitisches Etymologisches Glossar II. L–M. (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 20) Innsbruck.

HEG T, D = Tischler, J. 1991–1994: Hethitisches Etymologisches Glossar III. (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 20) Innsbruck

Herbordt, S. 2005: Die Prinzen- und Beamtensiegel der hethitischen Grossreichszeit auf Tonbullen aus dem Nişantepe-Archiv in Hattusa. (Boğazköy-Ḫattuša. Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 19) Mainz am Rhein.

Hill, N. W. 2019: The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese and Chinese. Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316550939

van den Hout, Th. P. J. 2002: Self, Soul and Portrait in Hieroglyphic Luwian. In: Taracha, P. (ed.): Silva Anatolica. Anatolian Studies Presented to Maciej Popko on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. Warsaw, 171–186.

Kloekhorst, A. 2004: The preservation of *h1 in Hieroglyphic Luwian: two separate a-signs. Historische Sprachforschung 117, 26–49.

Kloekhorst, A. 2006: Initial Laryngeals in Anatolian. Historische Sprachforschung 119, 77–108.

Kloekhorst, A. 2008: Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon. (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 5) Leiden – Boston.

Kloekhorst, A. 2014: Accent in Hittite: A study in plene spelling, consonant gradation, clitics, and metrics. (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 56) Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc2rm8t

Kloekhorst, A. 2018: Anatolian evidence suggests that the Indo-European laryngeals *h2 and *h3 were uvular stops. Indo-European Linguistics 6, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-00601003

Kloekhorst, A. 2019a: Kanišite Hittite. The Earliest Attested Record of Indo-European. (Handbuch der Orientalistik I/132) Leiden – Boston. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004382107

Kloekhorst, A. 2019b: The etymology of Hieroglyphic Luwian izi(ya)‑di ‘to do, to make’: an athematic i-present in Anatolian. In: Adiego, I.-X. – García Trabazo, J. V. – Vernet, M. – Obrador-Cursach, B. – Martínez Rodríguez, E. (eds.): Luwic Dialects and Anatolian: Inheritance and Diffusion. (Barcino Monographica Orientalia 12 = Series Anatolica et Indogermanica 1) Barcelona, 163–180.

Kloekhorst, A. 2019c: The origin of the phonetic value of the Anatolian hieroglyphic sign *41 (CAPERE / ). Kadmos 58, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/kadmos-2019-0002

Laroche, E. 1960: Les hiéroglyphes hittites I. L’écriture. Paris.

Laroche, E. 1961: Review of H. Otten, Hethitische Totenrituale. Bibliotheca Orientalis 18, 83–84.

Melchert, H. C. 1994: Anatolian Historical Phonology. (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 3) Amsterdam.

Melchert, H. C. 2004: The inflection of some irregular Luvian neuter nouns. In: Groddek, D. – Rößle S. (eds.): Šarnikzel. Hethitologische Studien zum Gedenken an Emil Orgetorix Forrer (19.02.1894-10.01.1986). (Dresdner Beiträge zur Hethitologie 10) Dresden, 471–475.

Melchert, H. C. 2010: Spelling of Initial /a-/ in Hieroglyphic Luwian. In: Singer, I. (ed.): ipamati kistamati pari tumatimis. Luwian and Hittite Studies presented to J. David Hawkins on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday. (Monograph series of the Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University 28) Tel Aviv, 147–158.

Melchert, H. C. 2015: Hittite Historical Phonology after 100 Years (and after 20 years). In: Kim, R. I. – Mynářová, J. – Pavúk, P. (eds.): Hrozný and Hittite: The First Hundred Years. Proceedings of the International Conference Held at Charles University, Prague, 11–14 November 2015. (Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 107) Leiden, 258–276.

Mora, C. 1991: Sull’origine della scrittura geroglifica anatolica. Kadmos 30, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/kadm.1991.30.1.1

Mora-Marín, D. F. 2003: The origin of Mayan syllabograms and orthographic conventions. Written Language & Literacy 6, 193–238. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.6.2.04mor

Morpurgo Davies, A. 1987: “To put” and “to stand” in the Luwian languages. In: Watkins, C. (ed.): Studies in Memory of Warren Cowgill (1929–1985). Papers from the Fourth East Coast Indo-European Conference, Cornell University, June 6–9, 1985. Berlin – New York, 205–228.

Mouton, A. 2002: Y a-t-il une relation entre les motifs de la glyptique cappadocienne et les hiéroglyphes anatoliens? Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 44, 83–113.

Neu, E. 1972: Hethitisch genu-/ganu– „Knie“. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 86, 288–295.

Neumann, G. 1957: Zur Sprache der kretischen Linearschrift A. Glotta 36, 156–158.

Neumann, G. 1992: System und Ausbau der hethitischen Hieroglyphenschrift. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen I. Philologisch-Historische Klasse 3, 23–48.

Oreshko, R. 2013: Hieroglyphic Inscriptions of Western Anatolia: Long Arm of the Empire or Vernacular Tradition(s)? In: Mouton, A. – Rutherford, I. – Yakubovich, I. (eds.): Luwian Identities. Culture Language and Religion Between Anatolia and the Aegean. (Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 64) Leiden – Boston, 345–420. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253414_017

Oreshko, R. 2016: Studies in Hieroglyphic Luwian. Towards a Philological and Historical Reinterpretation of the SÜDBURG inscription. Unpublished PhD dissertation (Freie Universität Berlin). Berlin.

Oreshko, R. 2020: The onager kings of Anatolia: Hartapus, Gordis, Muška and the steppe strand in early Phrygian culture. Kadmos 59, 77–128. https://doi.org/10.1515/kadmos-2020-0005

Payne, A. 2015: Schrift und Schriftlichkeit. Die anatolische Hieroglyphenschrift. Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc16s7k

Plöchl, R. 2003: Einführung ins Hieroglyphen-Luwische. (Dresdner Beiträge zur Hethitologie 8) Dresden.

Rieken, E. 2010: Das Zeichen <tá> im Hieroglyphen-Luwischen. In: Cohen, Y. – Gilan, A. – Miller, J. L. (eds.): Pax Hethitica. Studies on the Hittites and their Neighbours in Honour of Itamar Singer. (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 51) Wiesbaden, 301–310.

Rieken, E. 2015: Bemerkungen zum Ursprung einiger Merkmale der anatolischen Hieroglyphenschrift. Die Welt des Orients 45, 216–231. https://doi.org/10.13109/wdor.2015.45.2.216

Ritner, R. K. 1996: Egyptian Writing. In: Daniels, P. T. – Bright, W. (eds.): The World’s Writing Systems. New York – Oxford, 73–84.

Rüster, C. – Neu, E. 1989: Hethitisches Zeichenlexikon. Inventar und Interpretation der Keilschriftzeichen aus den Boğazköy-Texten. (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten, Beiheft 2) Wiesbaden.

Sasseville, D. 2020: Reconstruction Proto-Anatolian *k̑Er(-eh2)-u̯r̥/un– ‘horn’. In: eDiAna. https://www.ediana.gwi.uni-muenchen.de/dictionary.php?lemma=935 (accessed: 03.05.2022).

Sasseville, D. 2021a: Anatolian Verbal Stem Formation. Luwian, Lycian and Lydian. (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 21) Leiden – Boston. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004436299

Sasseville, D. 2021b: Lycian A mupm̃me/i- ‘as many as four’. In: eDiAna. https://www.ediana.gwi.uni-muenchen.de/dictionary.php?lemma=1438 (accessed: 03.05.2022).

Simon, Zs. 2011a: Der phonetische Wert der luwischen Laryngale. In: Taracha, P. (ed.): Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Hittitology. Warsaw, 5–9 September 2011. Warsaw, 873–895.

Simon, Zs. 2011b: Die Fortsetzung der Laryngale im Karischen. In: Krisch, T. – Lindner, Th. (eds.): Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog. Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg. Wiesbaden, 538–547.

Simon, Zs. 2013: Once again on the Hieroglyphic Luwian sign *19 <á>. Indogermanische Forschungen 118, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/indo.2013.118.2013.1

Simon, Zs. 2020 [2022]: On the Origins of the Hieroglyphic Luwian Writing System: The Chronological Problem. Chatreššar 2, 42–56.

Starke, F. 1990: Untersuchung zur Stammbildung des keilschrift-luwischen Nomens. (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 31) Wiesbaden.

Steele, Ph. M. – Meißner T. 2017: From Linear B to Linear A: The problem of the backward projection of sound values. In: Steele, Ph. M. (ed.): Understanding Relations Between Scripts. The Aegean Writing Systems. Oxford – Philadelphia, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dr51.11

Valério, M. 2018: Linguistic awareness in the development of the Anatolian hieroglyphic sign values. Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici NS 4, 143–160.

Vernus, P. 2015: Écriture hiéroglyphique égyptienne et écriture protosinaïtique: une typologie comparée. Acrophonie «forte» et acrophonie «faible». In: Rico, C. – Attucci, C. (eds.): Origins of the Alphabet. Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference. Cambridge, 142–175.

Vertegaal, A. J. J. 2018: Signs of Length. Indogermanische Forschungen 123, 159–210. https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2018-0007

Vertegaal, A. J. J. 2019: The spelling and phonology of the dental stops in Hieroglyphic Luwian. Kadmos 58, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/kadmos-2019-0001

Vertegaal, A. J. J. 2020: Syllable weight gradation in the Luwic languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 118, 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12186

Waal, W. 2011: They wrote on wood. The case for a hieroglyphic scribal tradition on wooden writing boards in Hittite Anatolia. Anatolian Studies 61, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154600008760

Weiss, M. 2016: The Proto-Indo-European Laryngeals and the Name of Cilicia in the Iron Age. In: Byrd, A. M. – DeLisi, J. – Wenthe, M. (eds.): Tavet Tat Satyam. Studies in Honor of Jared S. Klein on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. Ann Arbor, 331–340.

Whittaker, G. 2021: Deciphering Aztec Hieroglyphs. A Guide to Nahuatl Writing. London.

Yakubovich, I. 2008: Hittite-Luvian bilingualism and the development of the Anatolian hieroglyphs. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 4, 9–36.

Yakubovich, I. 2010: Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language. (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 2) Leiden. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047440277

Yakubovich, I. 2021: Hieroglyphic Luwian /attan(i)-/, COR-ni– ‘soul, self’. In: eDiAna. https://www.ediana.gwi.uni-muenchen.de/dictionary.php?lemma=525 (accessed: 03.05.2022).

Yakubovich, I. (online): Annotated Corpus of Luwian Texts. http://web-corpora.net/LuwianCorpus/search/ (accessed: 19 November 2021).