Musanzi, Muškanzi und Suranzi in Karkamiš

Diether Schürr*

Show more

* – Independent scholar. Email: diether.schuerr@gmx.net

Cite as Schürr, D. 2023: Musanzi, Muškanzi und Suranzi in Karkamiš. Hungarian Assyriological Review 4: 141–147.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52093/hara-202301-00038-000

Abstract

The fame of Yariris, a Karkamiš statesman of around 800 BC, did not only reach Egypt and Babylon but also three, probably neighbouring peoples in the north. The Musanzi are here linked with the land Muša between the Euphrates and Malatya, mentioned once in an Urartian inscription, and the Muškanzi with the land Muška, mentioned in two Late Luwian inscriptions of great king Hartapus: probably not Phrygia or another enemy country, but his own land, i.e., the later Lycaonia. The Suranzi are certainly the people of the land Sura, an enemy of Karkamiš, defeated around 1000 BC: probably, the land of the Syr(i)oi or Leukosyrioi in Greek tradition, i.e., Cappadocia.

Near Eastern geography; Early Iron Age; Hieroglyphic/Late Luwian inscriptions, Urartian inscriptions

Copyright and acknowledgements

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Creative Commons License

Data availability. The author confirms that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Disclosure statement. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Funding statement. The author received no financial support for the research and the publication of this article.

Bibliography

ACLT = Yakubovich, I. (2007–2009): Annotated Corpus of Luwian Texts. http://web-corpora.net/LuwianCorpus

Astour, M. C. 1979: The Arena of Tiglath-pileser III’s Campaign Against Sarduri II (743 B.C.). Assur 2, 69–91.

Bányai, M. 2023: Hartapu – Hittite afterlife following the empire. Aramazd 17/1, 22–61.

Cowley, A. 1917: Notes on Hittite Hieroglyphic Inscriptions. The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1917, 561–585. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00050565

Dan, R. 2020: A Study of the Toponyms of the Kingdom of Bia/Urarṭu. (Serie Orientale Roma NS 19) Roma.

Goedegebuure, P. M. 2007: The Hieroglyphic Luwian demonstrative ablative-instrumentals zin and apin. Studi micenei ed egeo-anatolici 49, 319–334.

Goedegebuure, P. – van den Hout, Th. – Osborne, J. – Massa, M. – Bachhuber, Ch. – Şahın, F. 2020: TÜRKMEN-KARAHÖYÜK 1: a new Hieroglyphic Luwian inscription from Great King Hartapu, son of Mursili, conqueror of Phrygia. Anatolian Studies 70, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154620000022

Hawkins, J. D. 1975: The Negatives in Hieroglyphic Luwian. Anatolian Studies 25, 119–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/3642579

Hawkins, J. D. 2000: Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions I. Inscriptions of the Iron Age. (Untersuchungen zur indogermanischen Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft 8/1). Berlin – New York.

Hawkins, J. D. 2024: Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions III. Inscriptions of the Hittite Empire and New Inscriptions of the Iron Age. Berlin – Boston. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110778854

Hawkins, J. D. – Weeden , M. 2021: The New Inscription from Türkmenkarahöyük and its Historical Context. Altorientalische Forschungen 48, 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1515/aofo-2021-0015

Kühne, H. 2023: Rethinking the Neo-Assyrian Geography of Tur Abdin. In: Şahoğlu, V. – Tuğcu, I. – Kouka, Ou. – Gündoğan, Ü. – Çayır, Ü. – Tuncel, R. – Erkanal Öktü, A. (Hg.): Hayat: Arkeolojiye Adanmış Bir Yaşam. Hayat Erkanal Anısına Akdeniz Arkeolojisi Üzerine Çalışmalar / Hayat: a Life Dedicated to Archeology. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology in Memory of Hayat Erkanal. Ankara, 287–308.

Lipiński, E. 2002: Diyarbakır – an Aramaean Capital of the 9th Century B.C. and its Territory. In: Taracha, P. (Hg.): Silva Anatolica. Anatolian Studies Presented to Maciej Popko on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Warsaw, 225–239.

Meriggi, P. 21962: Hieroglyphisch-Hethitisches Glossar. Wiesbaden.

Obrador Cursach, B. 2015: Were the Phrygians Muški? Several Notes about a Classical Issue. In: Olaya Montero, N. – Montoza Coca, M. – Aguilera Felipe, A. – Gómez Guiu, R. (Hg.): II Jornadas Predoctorales en Estudios de la Antigüedad y de la Edad Media. Κτῆμα ἐς αἰεὶ: el texto como herramienta común para estudiar el pasado. Proceedings of the Second Postgraduate Conference in Studies of Antiquity and Middle Ages, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 19-21st November 2014. Oxford, 7–12.

Oreshko, R. 2020: The onager kings of Anatolia: Hartapus, Gordis, Muška and the steppe strand in early Phrygian culture. Kadmos 59, 77–128. https://doi.org/10.1515/kadmos-2020-0005

Oreshko, R. 2023: Ambassador, Doctor and Regent Famed in Babylon: Observations on the Hieroglyphic-Luwian Logogram for “Babylon” and the Illustrious Career of Yarris of Karkemish. In: Grekyan, Y. H. (Hg.): By God’s Grace. Ancient Anatolian Studies Presented to Aram Kosyan on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. (Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement 61). Leuven – Paris – Bristol, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.12949141.21

Salvini, M. 2008: Corpus dei testi urartei I. Le iscrizioni su pietra e roccia. I testi. (Documenta Asiana 8/1) Roma.

Salvini, M. 2018: Corpus dei testi urartei V. Revisioni delle epigrafi e nuovi testi su pietra e roccia (CTU A), dizionario urarteo, schizzo grammaticale della lingua urartea. (Documenta Asiana 8/5) Roma.

Schürr, D. 2017: Zum Beginn der YALBURT-Inschrift. Kadmos 56, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/kadmos-2017-0002

Schürr, D. 2022: Luwische Städte- und Länderglyphen. Hungarian Assyriological Review 3, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.52093/hara-202201-00028-000

Schürr, D. 2023: Annäherungen an ‚Hartapus‘. In: Grekyan, Y. H. (Hg.): By God’s Grace. Ancient Anatolian Studies Presented to Aram Kosyan on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. (Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement 61). Leuven – Paris – Bristol, 301–325. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.12949141.27

Simon, Zs. 2012: Where is the Land of Sura of the Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscription KARKAMIŠ A4b and Why Were Cappadocians Called Syrians by Greeks? Altorientalische Forschungen 39, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1524/aofo.2012.0011

Simon, Zs. 2019: The Origins of Lycaonia. In: Maner, Ç. (Hg.): Crossroads. Konya Plain from Prehistory to the Byzantine Period. 9th International ANAMED Annual Symposium. / Kavşaklar. Prehistorik Çağ’dan Bizans Dönemine Konya Ovası. 9. Uluslararası ANAMED Yıllık Sempozyumu. İstanbul, 107–119.

Starke, F. 1997: Sprachen und Schriften in Karkamis. In: Pongratz-Leisten, B. – Kühne, H. – Xella, P. (Hg.): Ana šadî Labnāni lū allik. Beiträge zu altorientalischen und mittelmeerischen Kulturen. Festschrift für Wolfgang Röllig. (Alter Orient und Altes Testament 247). Kevelaer – Neukirchen-Vluyn, 381–395.

Starke, F. 2002: Die hethitischen Nachfolgestaaten und ihre Nachbarn im 12. – 8./7. Jh. v. Chr. In: N. N. (Hg.): Die Hethiter und ihr Reich. Das Volk der 1000 Götter. Stuttgart, 308–309.

Wilhelm, G. 1993: Sura/i in Kargamiš und das urartäische Gentiliz Šurele. Studi micenei ed egeo-anatolici 31, 135–141.

Yakubovich, I. 2010: Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 2). Leiden – Boston. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047440277

Yakubovich, I. 2019: The Mighty Weapon of Tarhunt. In: Avetisyan, P. S. – Dan, R. – Grekyan, Y. H. (Hg.): Over the Mountains and Far Away. Studies in Near Eastern history and archaeology presented to Mirjo Salvini on the occasion of his 80th birthday. Oxford, 544–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvndv9f0.65

Younger, K. L. 2014: The Scripts of North Syria in the Early First Millennium: The Inscription of Yariri (KARKAMIŠ A15b) Once Again. Transeuphratène 46, 169–183.