An abbreviated version of En-metena 1 from the Sulaymaniyah Museum

Ardalan Khwshnaw(a), Gábor Zólyomi(b)

Show more

(a) – Salahaddin University, Erbil

(b) – Department of Assyriology and Hebrew Studies, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest. Email: zolyomi.gabor@btk.elte.hu

Cite as: Khwshnaw, A., Zólyomi, G. 2020: An abbreviated version of En-metena 1 from the Sulaymaniyah Museum. Hungarian Assyriological Review 1, 21-37.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52093/hara-202001-00002-000

Open Access

Abstract

This paper contains the publication of a previously unknown manuscript of En-metena 1 (RIME 1.9.5.1), which is kept in the Sulaymaniyah Museum in Iraq. The new manuscript contains an abbreviated version of the text compared to the text on the Louvre cone and the Yale jar. Although only about the half of the round object that carries the text is preserved, it may be estimated that the Sulaymaniyah manuscript originally was at least 89 lines shorter than the Louvre and the Yale manuscripts.

Keywords: Sumerian, En-metena, Lagaš, royal inscriptions, 3rd millennium BC

Copyright and acknowledgements

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Creative Commons License

Data availability. The author confirms that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Disclosure statement. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Funding statement. The author received no financial support for the research and the publication of this article.

References

Al-Asadi, Y. 2015: Vultures Obelisk: A Model for Integration Narrative between the Art Work and of the Sumerian Writings. Magazine of Historical Studies and Archaeology 47, 52–122 (in Arabic).

Almamori, H. O. 2014: Gišša (Umm al-Aqarib), Umma (Jokha), and Lagaš in the Early Dynastic III Period. Al-Rāfidān 35, 1–37.

Balke, T. 2006: Das sumerische Dimensionalkasussystem. (Alter Orient und Altest Testament 331) Münster.

Bauer, J. 1998: Der vorsargonische Abschnitt der mesopotamischen Geschichte. In: Bauer, J. et al.: Mesopotamien. Späturuk-Zeit und Frühdynastische Zeit. (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 160, I) Fribourg — Göttingen, 431–585.

Cancik-Kirschbaum, E. 2007: Text — Situation — Format. Die materielle Gegenwart des Textes. In: Morenz, L. — Schorch, S. (eds.): Was ist ein Text? Alttestamentliche, ägyptologische und altorientalische Pespektiven. (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 362) Berlin — New York, 155–168.

Cooper, J. S. 1986: Sumerian and Akkadian Royal Inscriptions, Vol. I: Presargonic Inscriptions. (The American Oriental Society. Translations Series 1) New Haven.

Frayne, D. 2007: Presargonic Period (2700–2350 BC). (The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia. Early Periods 1) Toronto. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442688865

Jagersma, A. H. 2010: A descriptive grammar of Sumerian. PhD Dissertation, Universiteit Leiden.

Marzahn, J. 1997: Entemena in Uruk. Baghdader Mitteilungen 28, 87–96.

Pemberton, W. – Postgate, J. N. – Smyth, R. F. 1988: Canals and bunds, ancient and modern. Bulletin on Sumerian Agriculture 4, 207–221.

Selz, G. 1995: Untersuchungen zur Götterwelt des altsumerischen Stadtstaates von Lagaš. (Occasional Publications of the Samuel Noah Kramer Fund 13) Philadelphia.

Steible, H. – Behrens, H. 1982: Die altsumerischen Bau- und Weihinschriften, I-II. (Freiburger Altorientalische Studien 5) Stuttgart.

Willcocks, W. 1899, Egyptian Irrigation. 2nd edition. London – New York.

Zólyomi, G. 2017: An Introduction to the Grammar of Sumerian. With the collaboration of Sz. Jáka-Sövegjártó and M. Hagymássy. Budapest.

Zólyomi, G. 2019a: On the meaning of a-e i3-mi-e3 in En-metena 1. Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires, 2–5 (No. 2)

Zólyomi, G. 2019b: Native-speaker intuitions about genitive constructions in Sumerian. Altorientalische Forschungen 46, 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1515/aofo-2019-0019

Figures

Figure 1. The beginning of cols. 2–4. Photo courtesy of the Sulaymaniyah Museum.

Figure 2. The beginning of the text of cols. 2–4 after the gap. Photo courtesy of the Sulaymaniyah Museum.

Figure 3. The middle part of cols. 2–4. Photo courtesy of the Sulaymaniyah Museum.

Figure 4. The beginning and end of cols. 2–4. Photo courtesy of the Sulaymaniyah Museum.

Figure 5. Part of the upper part of T.3860 with the end of col. 1. Photo courtesy of the Sulaymaniyah Museum.

Figure 6. Part of the upper part of T.3860 with the beginning of col. 1. Photo courtesy of the Sulaymaniyah Museum.

Figure 7. Bottom of T.3860. Photo courtesy of the Sulaymaniyah Museum.

Figure 8. Inside of T.3860. Photo courtesy of the Sulaymaniyah Museum.

Tables

Table 1. [without title] – download csv

Table 2. [without title] – download csv