The morphophonological analysis of Hittite šipantaš, šipandaš ‘(s)he libated’

Alwin Kloekhorst(a)

Show more

(a) – Leiden University. Email: a.kloekhorst@hum.leidenuniv.nl

Cite as: Kloekhorst, A. 2020: The morphophonological analysis of Hittite šipantaš, šipandaš ‘(s)he libated’. Hungarian Assyriological Review 1: 99–104.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52093/hara-202002-00007-000

Open Access

Abstract

This article starts with the observation that the Hittite 3sg.pret.act. form šipantaš, šipandaš (OH/MS) ‘(s)he libated’ can hardly be analysed as consisting of a tarna-class inflected stem šipant/da- + the 3sg.pret.act. ending , since the OH/MH verbal paradigm of ‘to libate’ contains no other tarna-class inflected forms. It is therefore argued that šipantaš, šipandaš should be analysed as consisting of the consonantal verbal stem šipant- + , which implies that the a in šipantaš, šipandaš is an empty vowel. In order to explain the spelling -ntaš, -ntaš vs. the spelling -nza, which is commonly used to note down the sequence /-nts/ < PIE *-nts, it is argued that -ntaš, -ndaš denotes /-ntːs/, the regular outcome of a PIE sequence *-nds.

Keywords: Hittite, phonology, cuneiform

Copyright and acknowledgements

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Creative Commons License

Data availability. The author confirms that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Disclosure statement. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Funding statement. The author received no financial support for the research and the publication of this article.

Bibliography

CHD = Güterbock, H. G. ‒ Hoffner, H. A. ‒ van den Hout, Th. P. J. (eds.) 1983‒: The Hittite Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Chicago.

Francia, R. ‒ Pisaniello, V. 2019: La Lingua degli Ittiti. (Collana di Lingue antiche del Vicino Oriente e del Mediterraneo) Milano.

Hoffner, H. A. ‒ Melchert, H. C. 2008: A Grammar of the Hittite Language. (Languages of the Ancient Near East 1) Winona Lake.

van den Hout, Th. P. J. 2011: The Elements of Hittite. Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013369

Kimball, S. E. 1999: Hittite Historical Phonology. (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 95) Innsbruck.

Kloekhorst, A. 2006: Initial Laryngeals in Anatolian. Historische Sprachforschung 119, 77‒108.

Kloekhorst, A. 2008: Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon. (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 5) Leiden ‒ Boston.

Kloekhorst, A. 2013: The signs TA and DA in Old Hittite: Evidence for a phonetic difference. Altorientalische Forschungen 40, 125‒141. https://doi.org/10.1524/aof.2013.0007

Kloekhorst, A. 2014a: Accent in Hittite: A Study in Plene Spelling, Consonant Gradation, Clitics, and Metrics. (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 56) Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc2rm8t

Kloekhorst, A. 2014b: Once more on Hittite ā/e-ablauting ḫi-verbs. Indogermanische Forschungen 119, 55‒77. https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2014-0005

Kloekhorst, A. 2016: The Anatolian stop system and the Indo-Hittite hypothesis. Indogermanische Forschungen 121, 213‒247. https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2016-0013

Kloekhorst, A. 2019: The spelling of clusters of dental stop + sibilant in Hittite. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 73, 55‒72.

Kloekhorst, A. 2020: The phonetics and phonology of the Hittite dental stops. In: Kim, R. I. ‒ Mynářová, J. ‒ Pavúk, P. (eds.): Hrozný and Hittite: The First Hundred Years. Proceedings of the International Conference Held at Charles University, Prague, 11–14 November 2015. (Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 107) Leiden ‒ Boston, 147-175. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004413122_010

Kloekhorst, A. forthcoming: The phonetics and phonology of Hittite intervocalic fortis and lenis stops. Bibliotheca Orientalis.

Luraghi, S. 1997: Hittite. (Languages of the World/Materials 114) München ‒ Newcastle.

Melchert, H. C. 1994: Anatolian Historical Phonology. (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 3) Amsterdam ‒ Atlanta.

Oettinger, N. 1979: Die Stammbildung des hethitischen Verbums. (Erlanger Beiträge zur Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft 64) Nürnberg.

Patri, S. 2009: L’adaptation des consonnes hittites dans certaines langues du XIIIe siècle. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 99, 87‒126. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZA.2009.003

Patri, S. 2019: Phonologie hittite. (Handbuch der Orientalistik 130) Leiden ‒ Boston. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004394247

Simon, Zs. 2020: The Anatolian stop system and the Indo-Hittite hypothesis ‒ revisited. In: Serangeli, M. ‒ Olander, T. (eds.): Dispersals and Diversification. Linguistic and Archaeological Perspectives on the Early Stages of Indo-European. (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 19) Leiden ‒ Boston, 236‒250. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004416192_013

Vanséveren, S. 2006: Nisili. Manuel de langue hittite I. (Lettres orientales 10) Leuven.

Watkins, C. 2004: Hittite. In: Woodard, R. D. (ed.): The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of the World’s Ancient Languages. Cambridge, 551‒575.

Weiss, M. 2020: Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor ‒ New York.

Yates, A. 2019: The phonology, phonetics, and diachrony of Sturtevant’s Law. Indo-European Linguistics 7, 241‒307. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-00701006