Luwische Städte- und Länderglyphen (Hieroglyphic Luwian city and country glyphs)

Diether Schürr*

Show more

* – Independent scholar. Email: diether.schuerr@gmx.net

Cite as Schürr, D., 2022: Luwische Städte- und Länderglyphen. Hungarian Assyriological Review 3: 49–61.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52093/hara-202201-00028-000

Abstract

The Luwian hieroglyphic script has special signs for towns and countries. At least nine are attested in Empire Luwian inscriptions, only four of them returning in Late Luwian inscriptions. Four others are attested in Late Luwian inscriptions only but may be inherited from Empire Luwian too. In two cases, signs for gods are used as signs for towns and countries in Empire Luwian only. In one case a common Empire Luwian logogram/syllabogram is used, possibly as an abbreviation. Phonetic complements are attested in some instances, and in Late Luwian also full phonetic writings occur instead of the special signs or immediately after them (four cases).

The sign *85 should not be transcribed as GENUFLECTERE like an otherwise attested Empire Luwian sign but should revert to HALPA. The transcriptions VITIS2 or VITIS+x for an Empire Luwian sign are inappropriate, because this sign is attested solely as denoting an unidentified toponym, and is evidently more than a mere variant of VITIS. Therefore, it is proposed that it be transcribed as *160+. The Empire Luwian and the Late Luwian writing for – probably – ‘Babylon’, both with the phonetic complement -la, were transcribed with different numbers, but the earlier form is not really *292 and shares the crosshatching with the later form *475. Therefore, it is proposed that they be transcribed as *475a and b.

Keywords: Luwian hieroglyphs, Empire Luwian, Late Luwian, toponymy

Copyright and acknowledgements

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Creative Commons License

Data availability. The author confirms that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Disclosure statement. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Funding statement. The author received no financial support for the research and the publication of this article.

Bibliography

 

Arroyo, A. 2013: A new reading for BOĞAZKÖY 12. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 145, 185–194.

Baykal-Seeher, A. – Seeher, J. 2003: Götterbilder aus Babylonstein? Eine hethitische Gußform aus Boğazköy-Hattuša. Istanbuler Mitteilungen 53, 99–111.

Bolatti Guzzo, N. – Marazzi, M. 2020: The Sign for «Wine» / «Vine» in Anatolian Hieroglyphic: A Formal Analysis. In: Balza, M. E. – Cotticelli-Kurras, P. – d’Alfonso, L. – Giorgieri, M. – Giusfredi, F. – Rizza, A. (Hg.), Città e parole, argilla e pietra. Studi offerti a Clelia Mora da allievi, colleghi e amici. (Biblioteca di Athenaeum 65) Bari-S. Spirito, 119–136.

Bossert, H. Th. 1960: Ist die B-L Schrift im wesentlichen entziffert? Orientalia NS 29, 423–442.

Dinçol, B. – Dinçol, A. – Hawkins, J. D. – Peker, H. – Öztan, A. 2015: Two new inscribed Storm-god stelae from Arsuz (İskenderun): ARSUZ 1 and 2. Anatolian Studies 65, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S006615461500006X

Ehringhaus, H. 2005: Götter, Herrscher, Inschriften. Die Felsreliefs der hethitischen Großreichszeit in der Türkei. (Zaberns Bildbände zur Archäologie) Mainz am Rhein.

Gander, M. 2014: Tlos, Oinonanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka lands. Some Thoughts on the History of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages. Klio 96, 369–415. https://doi.org/10.1515/klio-2014-0039

Goedegebuure, P. – van den Hout, Th. – Osborne, J. – Massa, M. – Bachhuber, Ch. – Şahin, F. 2020: TÜRKMEN-KARAHÖYÜK 1: A new Hieroglyphic Luwian inscription from Great King Hartapu, son of Mursili, conqueror of Phrygia. Anatolian Studies 70, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154620000022

Gronemeyer, S. 2016: The Linguistics of Toponymy in Maya Hieroglyphic Writing. In: Graña-Behrens, D. (Hg.), Places of Power and Memory in Mesoamerica’s Past and Present. How Sites, Toponyms and Landscapes Shape History and Remembrance. (Estudios Indiana 9) Berlin, 85–120.

Güterbock, H. G. 1973: Hittite Hieroglyphic Seal Impressions from Korucutepe. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 32, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1086/372227

Güterbock, H. G. 1977: The Hittite Seals in the Walters Art Gallery. Journal of the Walters Art Gallery 36, 7–16.

Hawkins, J. D. 1995: The Hieroglyphic Inscription of the Sacred Pool Complex at Hattusa (SÜDBURG). (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten, Beiheft 3) Wiesbaden.

Hawkins, J. D. 1998: The Land of Išuwa: the Hieroglyphic Evidence. In: Alp, S. – Süel, A. (Hg.), III. Uluslararası Hititoloji Kongresi Bildirileri: Çorum, 16-22 Eylül, 1996 / Acts of the IIIrd International Congress of Hittitology: Çorum, September 16-22, 1996. Ankara, 281–295.

Hawkins, J. D. 2000: Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions I. Inscriptions of the Iron Age. (Untersuchungen zur indogermanischen Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft 8/1) Berlin – New York.

Hawkins, J. D. 2003: The Storm-God Seal of Mursili III. In: Beckman, G. – Beal, R. – McMahon, G. (Hg.), Hittite Studies in Honor of Harry A. Hoffner Jr. on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Winona Lake, 169–175. https://doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv1bxh2x6.19

Hawkins, J. D. 2006: Tudḫaliya the Hunter. In: van den Hout, Th. (Hg.), The Life and Times of Ḫattušili III and Tutḫaliya IV: Proceedings of a Symposium held in Honour of J. de Roos, 12-13 December 2003, Leiden. (Uitgaven van het Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten te Leiden 103) Leiden, 49–76.

Hawkins, J. D. 2011: The inscriptions of the Aleppo temple. Anatolian Studies 61, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154600008772

Hawkins, J. D. 2019: The Rock Inscription of Nişantaş (BOǦAZKÖY 5). In: Neve, P., Die Oberstadt von Hattuša: Die Bauwerke III. Die Bebauung im südlichen Vorfeld von Büyükkale. Nişantepe – Südburg – Ostplateau (Grabungen 1988–1993). (Boğazköy-Hattuša 20) Berlin – Boston, 137–147, Taf. 125–127.

Hawkins, J. D. in Vorbereitung: Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions III.

Herbordt, S. 2005: Die Prinzen- und Beamtensiegel der hethitischen Großreichszeit auf Tonbullen aus dem Nişantepe-Archiv in Hattuša. (Boğazköy-Hattuša 19) Mainz am Rhein.

Herbordt, S. – Bawanypeck, D. – Hawkins, J. D. 2011: Die Siegel der Großkönige und Großköniginnen auf Tonbullen aus dem Nişantepe-Archiv in Hattusa. (Boğazköy-Hattuša 23) Darmstadt – Mainz.

Kryszeń, A. 2017: Ḫatti and Ḫattuša. Altorientalische Forschungen 44, 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1515/aofo-2017-0018

Laroche, E. 1960: Les hiéroglyphes hittites. I: L’écriture. Paris.

Maner, Ç. – Weeden, M. – Alparslan, M. 2021: Archäologische Forschungen am Karacadağ und eine hieroglyphenluwische Inschrift aus Karaören. Altorientalische Forschungen 48, 347–383. https://doi.org/10.1515/aofo-2021-0019

Marazzi, M. 2018: Il “Progetto Hattusa”: una cooperazione italo-tedesca per la sperimentazione di nuove tecnologie applicate all’archeologia e all’epigrafia anatolica. In: Betrò, M. – De Martino, S. – Miniaci, G. – Pinnock, F. (Hg.), Egitto e Vicino Oriente antichi: tra passato e futuro. Studi e ricerche sull’Egitto e il Vicino Oriente in Italia. I convegno nazionale, Pisa, 5-6 giugno 2017. Pisa, 187–200.

Marazzi, M. 2019: Schriftlichkeit und königliche Zelebration in Hattusa gegen das Ende des 13. Jh. v. Chr. Über die sogenannten „langen“ Hieroglypheninschriften. In: Bolatti Guzzo, N. – Taracha, P. (Hg.), ‟And I Knew Twelve Languages”. A Tribute to Massimo Poetto on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday. Warsaw, 332–355.

Marazzi, M. (Hg.) 1998: Il Geroglifico Anatolico. Sviluppi della ricerca a venti anni dalla sua „ridecifrazione″. Atti del Colloquio e della tavola rotonda. Napoli-Procida, 5-9 giugno 1995. (Istituto Universitario Orientale. Dipartimento di Studi Asiatici. Series Minor 57) Napoli.

Masson, E. 1979: Les inscriptions louvites hiéroglyphiques d’Emirgazi. Journal des savants 1979, 3–52. https://doi.org/10.3406/jds.1979.1382

Melchert, H. C. 1988: “Thorn” and “Minus” in Hieroglyphic Luvian Orthography. Anatolian Studies 38, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3642839

Oreshko, R. 2012: Studies in Hieroglyphic Luwian: Towards a Philological and Historical Reinterpretation of the SÜDBURG inscription. Unveröffentlichte Doktorarbeit (Freie Universität Berlin). Berlin.

Oreshko, R. 2013: “The Achaean Hides, Caged in Yonder Beams”: The Value of Hieroglyphic Luwian Sign *429 Reconsidered and a New Light on the Cilician Ahhiyawa. Kadmos 52, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/kadmos-2013-0002

Oreshko, R. 2017: Hartapu and the Land of Maša. A New Look at the KIZILDAĞ-KARADAĞ Group. Altorientalische Forschungen 44, 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/aofo-2017-0007

Otten, H. 1995: Die hethitischen Königssiegel der frühen Großreichszeit. (Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz, Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse 1995/7) Stuttgart.

Poetto, M. 1993: L’iscrizione luvio-geroglifico di Yalburt. Nuove acquisizioni relative alla geografia dell’Anatolia sud-occidentale. (Studia Mediterranea 8) Pavia.

Poetto, M. 1998: Traces of Geography in Hieroglyphic Luwian Documents of the Late Empire and Early Post-Empire Period (BOĞAZKÖY-SÜDBURG and KIZILDAĞ IV): the Case of Masa. In: Alp, S. – Süel, A. (Hg.): III. Uluslararası Hititoloji Kongresi Bildirileri, Çorum 16-22 Eylül 1996. Acts of the IIIrd International Congress of Hittitology. Çorum, September 16-22, 1996. Ankara, 469–479.

Poetto, M. 2010: Un nuovo frammento in luvio geroglifico da Ancoz (ANCOZ 12). In: Singer, I. (Hg.), ipamati kistamati pari tumatimis. Luwian and Hittite studies presented to J. David Hawkins on the occasion of his 70th birthday. (Tel Aviv University Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology Monograph Series 28) Tel Aviv, 188–192.

Poetto, M. – Bolatti-Guzzo, N. 1994: La leggenda in luvio geroglifico sulla cretula 81/402 del Museo Archeologico di Kayseri: una revisione. Studi epigrafici e linguistici sul Vicino Oriente antico 11, 11–15.

Rieken, E. 2008: Die Zeichen ‹ta›, ‹tá› und ‹tà› in den hieroglyphen-luwischen Inschriften der Nachgroßreichszeit. Studi micenei ed egeo anatolici 50, 637–647.

Rieken, E. 2010: Das Zeichen ‹› im Hieroglyphen-Luwischen. In: Süel, A. (Hg.), VII. Uluslararası Hititoloji Kongresi Bildirileri. Çorum, 25-31 Ağustos, 2008 / Acts of the VIIth International Congress of Hittitology. Çorum, August 25-31, 2008. Ankara, 651–660.

Schürr, D. 2010: Zur Vorgeschichte Lykiens: Städtenamen in hethitischen Quellen. Klio 92, 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1524/klio.2010.0001

Schürr, D. 2016: Zu lykisch ϑϑẽ und seiner etymologischen Interpretation. Indogermanische Forschungen 121, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2016-0007

Schürr, D. 2020: Floh im Ohr: Forrers Ahhijawā-Deutung, Āhhiyā und ihr kilikischer Nachzügler Hijawa. Hungarian Assyriological Review 1, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.52093/hara-202002-00009-000

Schürr, D. demnächst: Annäherungen an „Hartapus“. In: Festschrift für N. N.

Simon, Zs. 2012: Where is the Land of Sura of the Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscription KARKAMIŠ A4b and Why Were Cappadocians Called Syrians by Greeks? Altorientalische Forschungen 39, 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1524/aofo.2012.0011

Simon, Zs. 2016: Wer war Allumari, König von Malatya? Anatolica 42, 67–76.

Starke, F. 1997: Sprachen und Schriften in Karkamis. In: Pongratz-Leisten, B. – Kühne, H. – Xella, P. (Hg.), Ana šadî Labnāni lū allik. Beiträge zu altorientalischen und mittelmeerischen Kulturen. Festschrift für Wolfgang Röllig (Alter Orient und Altes Testament 247), Kevelaer – Neukirchen-Vluyn, 381–395.

Van Quickelberghe, E. 2019: La mention de la ville de Ura dans le sceaux de Nerikkaili? Babelao 8, 657–676. https://doi.org/10.14428/babelao.vol8.2019.19663

Weeden, M. 2018: The Good God, the Wine-god and the Storm-god of the Vineyard. Die Welt des Orients 48, 330–356. https://doi.org/10.13109/wdor.2018.48.2.330

Werner, R. 1991: Kleine Einführung ins Hieroglyphen-Luwische. (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 106) Freiburg.